The Supreme Council

for

Sports in Africa (S.C.S.A.).

 



Chief Abraham Ordia first from right.

The Supreme Council for Sports in Africa, or the S.C.S.A., was founded In 1965, by its first President and at the time the Interior Minister of Congo Brazzaville, André Hambessa. But, apart, from using the name for the initial purpose of organizing "The First ALL African Games" in his own country, Minister Hambessa did not define the structure of the Council as a Continental Organization. Interestingly, the official founding Conference of the S.C.S.A, in Bamako 1966, was equally vague on the issue of the organizational structure of the Supreme Council.

As a result of this ambiguity from the very outset; the S.C.S.A., was never legally mandated to represent or lead African sports, nor was it made responsible to any properly defined Continental constituency. Its obscure power base emanated from a tricky recognition of the all African games, by the summit of the Organization of African Unity, held in Kinshasa, in 1967.

This situation was misused by the Second President, Chief Abraham Ordia, and the Secretary General, Jean Claude Ganga; to conveniently avoid elections and hold on to their positions for the most part of the Council's early years. Encouraged by the continued backing from ill-informed African politicians and the big name attached to this otherwise hollow organization, the two men went further to claim undue authority over the continent's autonomous National Olympic Committees and Sports Confederations. The first victim of this intrusion was the better organized African Football Confederation, which was constitutionally founded eight years earlier than the Council itself.

During the Congress of the African Football Confederation held in Addis Ababa, In January of 1968; Jean Claude Ganga ventured to suggest that the Supreme Council co-ordinate the activities of all sports bodies in Africa. Yidnekatchew Tessema, explained, " The Confederation is an autonomous entity, responsible only to its member associations on the continental level, and to F.I.F.A. on the global level, it can not therefore possibly go beyond co-operation with the Supreme Council". The resolution of this Congress agreed on co-operation; implying the relationship would be between two independent organizations. The  first attempt to control the Confederation in the name of co-ordination was successfully blocked in this manner.

Thereafter, the Council's strategy changed to creating dissent within the continent's football family. It encouraged football players and Clubs to come forward with their grievances, indirectly pretending that it is the superior authority on the continent's football matters. It also became the self appointed provocative fault-finder on the Confederation. These interferences in the affairs of the Confederation, were subjects of endless controversy; although detractive to the Confederation, they were affordable full time jobs to the Council's  idle officials, who had no other meaningful mission of their own. Protecting the autonomy of the Confederation from the grasp of such individuals was not an easy affair. In the end, Secretary Ganga believed the supremacy of the Council, can only be realized with Yidnekatchew out of the way; to achieve this, he befriended Yidnekatchew's foes in Ethiopia, Africa and even on the global level, deliberately widening the battle front.

 

S.C.S.A. vs C.A.F.

One of many news paper clips of those days.

The differences between the two were further exasperated when Yidnekatchew Tessema took the lead in reacting to the International Olympic Committee's provocative decision to invite Apartheid South Africa to the 1968 Mexico Olympics. Yidnekatchew's declaration that "Ethiopia, the country of legendary "Abebe Bikila," winner of two successive Olympics Marathon Gold Medals, will boycott Mexico 68  if  the invitation was not withdrawn", received the Support of many African and then socialist European Countries as well as Cuba and Black Athletes from the United States Olympic team; forcing the International Olympic Committee to withdraw its invitation at the last minute and for the last time in the history of the Olympic Games. Ganga felt the centre stage was unfairly taken away from the S.C.S.A.. He failed to comprehend that the Supreme Council was not a mandated Association of  the National Olympic Committees of Africa.

 

Ganga & Yidnekatchew at the Ethiopian Embassy in Mexico 1968

Two years later, Yidnekatchew Tessema proposed proper restructuring of the Supreme Council, into an effective participatory Council of the Sports Ministers, the National Olympic Committees, and the Confederations of African sports. Nevertheless, any discussion and implementation of this useful proposal was again indefinitely postponed by the leaders of the Council. As can be seen in the letter below, the President, Chief Abraham Ordia, was more concerned about the circulation of the proposal than the need for reform.

At this juncture the Council's importance, both within and outside of the Continent was dwindling. Its flagship, the "All African Games", was beyond the the hosting capacity of almost all African Countries; hence, the second Games in Nigeria, (the Country of the President), had to be held a long eight years after the first in Congo Brazzaville, (the country of the Secretary General). All told, the early years of the Supreme Council for Sports in Africa were totally uneventful.

As can be seen in the following letters, the Council's stand on issues related to the struggle against Apartheid and the Rebel regime in Rhodesia, were also inconsistent at best.

 

 

Comparatively; from its establishment in 1957, the more successful African Football Confederation had hosted its biannual Continental Nations Cup editions without interruption. It had also started annual Club competitions. The popularity and the tremendous all round development of the Game was visible every where in the Continent. The Confederation's success in the struggle against Racial discrimination and Colonial attitudes was by far superior; it had suspended Apartheid in 1957, and expelled  Rhodesia from membership, only days after Ian Smith's unilateral declaration of independence.

It was this desperate situation the Council, that finally motivated J.C. Ganga to attempt a come back through a totally unnecessary boycott blackmail of the Montreal Games in 1976. After successfully obtaining an all African boycott threat from the Organization of African Unity, on the poor pretext of a New Zealand Rugby encounter with South Africa, he immediately traveled to Montreal, and in an all too obvious display of self-advertisement, he announced the boycott could be avoided if an urgent appointment could be arranged for him with the then I.O.C. President, Lord Killanin. The I.O.C. was evidently not interested, unlike Mexico 68, this illogical boycott call was not supported even by the traditional friends of Africa. It all backfired; Lord Killanin refused to see him, New Zealand was not expelled, some African National Olympic Committees ignored the call and participated in the Games. Due to Ganga's miscalculation, the divisive boycott of the Montreal Olympic Games, inflicted serious damage to the African cause and image. In the end, the only losers were Africa, and African athletes.

On his return from Montreal, Yidnekatchew Tessema wrote the following letters of protest:-

To  J.C. Ganga

 

 

 

 To Lord Killanin, the then President of the International Olympic Committee.

 

 

 

Three months later, African Athletes competed alongside New Zealand, in the I.A.A.F. World Athletic championship, in Düsseldorf, former West Germany. Although the essence of the pretext for the controversial boycott of Montreal had not changed, Mr. Ganga did not object!! After observing this very suspicious inconsistency, Yidnekatchew Tessema remarked:- "Mysterious Africa!!".

In his 1982 book "Apartheid, The Real Hurdle", Sam Ramsamy, had also proclaimed that the Montreal boycott in protest against New Zealand sending its National Rugby team to South Africa, was a success, supported by nineteen African Countries. He deliberately avoided any mention of the failure of this boycott in discouraging future Rugby contacts with Apartheid, and more importantly, the historic fact, that Africa did not boycott any of the successive Games, in which Countries that continued their Rugby contacts with Apartheid South Africa had participated. Mysterious Africa!!

The situation became more of a puzzle, when the blunderer Supreme Council for Sports in Africa, was recognized as a specialized Agency of the Organization of African Unity at the summit in Libreville-1977. Mysterious Africa!!

 

African sports leaders had enough, they decide to remove J.C. Ganga.

But, African Sports leaders had seen enough, they launched a campaign to remove Ganga from office. The campaign got the support of Canada, which did not forgive his last minute surprise attempt to disrupt the Montreal Games. Canada's influence with the Council of French speaking African Sports  Ministers, helped new comer Mr. Lamine Ba, of Senegal, to defeat Ganga 24/20 votes, during the election on 18 December 1979.

For Yidnekatchew Tessema, the issue was not the removal of the individual, but the total restructuring of the Supreme Council as per his suggestion of 1970. Therefore to the follow-up round table in Tunis, 19-22 November 1980, he  submitted a study, which In line with the requirements of the I.O.C & International Federations, called for the establishment of autonomous Association of National Olympic Committees, and autonomous union of the Continental Confederations, that would together with a Ministerial General Assembly constitute the Supreme Council of African Sports. The round table accepted the proposal in its entirety and after receiving positive feedbacks from all member countries, it setup a three persons Ad-Hoc Committee, consisting of; Yidnekatchew Tessema, Lamine Diack, and Lamine Ba, to work on the the final draft.

Yidnekatchew Lamine Diack & Lamine Ba

Accordingly, the new African Sports Structure prepared in this manner was adopted by the Congress of member countries, in Lome, Togo, in June of 1981; heralding the establishment of today's Association of National Olympic Committees and the Union of African Sports Confederations. As can be seen in the letters below the handover was neither clean, nor, easy.

 

                             

 

At its first all inclusive meeting in Yaoundé, on May 07 1983, the Executive Committee of the new Supreme Council for Sports in Africa, acknowledged Yidnekatchew Tessema as " The author of the new structure for the management of African sports".

First Congress of the reformed S.C.S.A.

This workable structure, has been in use ever since; Mr. Ganga himself, benefited from the reform when he was elected President of the Association of National Olympic Committees of Africa in 1989.

Seven years after this conflict was resolved, Yidnekatchew Tessema supported Ganga's candidature to I.O.C. membership. Explaining the change of heart, he said; " Despite all else, Ganga is at least vocal in International Congresses". Immediately after his co-option, Ganga visited then seriously ill Yidnekatchew at a Hospital in Lausanne, apologized for the past, and expressed gratitude for the support which he obviously did not anticipate.

Nevertheless, Ganga did not change; only ten months after Yidnekatchew Tessema passed away, he again conspired with the I.O.C. to distort the history of the struggle against Apartheid in sports. Click here for more on the shameless alteration.

In 1990, the African Football Confederation inexplicably awarded J.C. Ganga the Order of Merit in Gold!! It may be appropriate to forgive him for his early attempts to deprive the autonomy of the Confederation, but the undue award had belittled the highest recognition of merit enshrined in this medal.

Mr. Jean Claude Ganga was finally expelled from the International Olympic Committee, as the number one culprit in the famous Salt Lake City Scandal.

 

Back to home page Yidnekatchew Tessema